Brain & C-spine CT scan Analysis for Junior Doctors

Basic CT Brain and C-Spine Analysis for Junior Doctors

Introduction

CT scans are commonly used to evaluate patients with suspected brain or cervical spine injury. As a junior doctor, having a structured approach to CT analysis helps with early recognition of life-threatening pathology and improves communication with radiology and the trauma team.

CT Brain Analysis – Key Features

When reviewing a CT brain, systematically look for:

CT C-Spine Analysis – Key Features

For the cervical spine CT, adopt a “bones, alignment, joints, soft tissue” approach:

CT Features of Common Intracranial Conditions

Condition CT Features
Subdural haemorrhage Crescent-shaped hyperdensity along brain surface, crossing suture lines, may track over a large area. Often associated with mass effect and possible midline shift.
Epidural haemorrhage Biconvex (lens-shaped) hyperdensity that typically does not cross suture lines. May cause mass effect and midline shift; commonly related to skull fracture.
Intracerebral / intraparenchymal haemorrhage Hyperdense collection within brain parenchyma with variable mass effect. Appearance depends on location and size; may extend into ventricles.
Space-occupying lesions (tumours, metastases) Irregular or rounded mass, often with surrounding hypodense vasogenic oedema, variable contrast enhancement, and possible midline shift.
Meningitis May show sulcal effacement, diffuse or localised oedema, meningeal enhancement with contrast, and/or ventriculomegaly. CT can be normal; clinical correlation is essential.
Pneumocephalus Intracranial air appearing as very low-density (black) areas, often after trauma or neurosurgery.
Base of skull fracture Fracture lines through temporal bone or skull base, air–fluid levels in sinuses or mastoid air cells, possible associated extra-axial haemorrhage.
Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) Hyperdensity in sulci, basal cisterns, or fissures. Diffuse SAH shows widespread cortical sulcal hyperdensity; localised SAH may be focal in a specific sulcus or cistern.
C-spine fractures Fracture lines of vertebral bodies or posterior elements, possible malalignment. Look carefully at occipito-cervical and cervico-thoracic junctions.

Example CT Images (Click to Enlarge)

Normal CT Brain
Normal CT Brain
Subdural haemorrhage
Subdural Haemorrhage
Epidural haemorrhage
Epidural Haemorrhage
Intra-cranial haemorrhage
Intra-cranial Haemorrhage
CT of brain tumour
CT of Brain Tumour
CT of meningitis
CT Features of Meningitis
Base of skull anatomy – diagram 1
Base of Skull Anatomy – Diagram 1
Base of skull anatomy – diagram 2
Base of Skull Anatomy – Diagram 2
Diffuse subarachnoid haemorrhage
Diffuse Subarachnoid Haemorrhage
Localised subarachnoid haemorrhage
Localised Subarachnoid Haemorrhage
C-spine fracture on CT
Example of a C-spine Fracture on CT

Intracranial Infarcts and Related Lesions – CT Features

Intracranial Lesion CT Features
Acute ischaemic stroke Area of low attenuation in a vascular territory, loss of grey–white differentiation, sulcal effacement; may have mild mass effect.
Haemorrhagic stroke Hyperdense intraparenchymal blood clot with or without surrounding oedema and mass effect; may have intraventricular extension.
Cerebral venous thrombosis May show “empty delta sign” with contrast (unenhanced thrombus centrally with enhancing sinus wall), venous infarcts, or haemorrhagic venous infarcts.
Brain abscess Ring-enhancing lesion with surrounding oedema; often appears as a mass lesion with central low attenuation. MRI and clinical context help distinguish from tumour.
Multiple sclerosis plaque Well-defined low-attenuation (or subtle) lesions, often periventricular; better seen on MRI, but CT may show hypodense plaques without mass effect.
Acute intracranial infarct
Acute Intracranial Infarct
Ischaemic stroke
Ischaemic Stroke
Haemorrhagic stroke
Haemorrhagic Stroke
Cerebral venous thrombosis
Cerebral Venous Thrombosis
CT of brain abscess
CT of Brain Abscess
Multiple sclerosis plaque
Multiple Sclerosis Plaque

Conclusion

CT brain and C-spine interpretation is complex and radiologist input is essential, but a structured approach allows junior doctors to identify major red flags early, prioritise management and communicate effectively with the team. Keep revisiting real cases and correlate CT findings with clinical presentation to build confidence.